Child Protection Hub for South East Europe
(DELETED) Z 99 61591 WAB
Retour refus? ; il y a eu d?placement, mais l’exception de l’art. 13(2) a ?t? retenue.
CA Paris, 5 octobre 2005, No de RG 2005/16526
1Ob532/92, Oberster Gerichtshof
Appeal dismissed and application dismissed; the removal did not breach any rights of custody.
Cavani v. Hungary (Application No 5493/13)
Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court, 2 UF 266/14, 16 December 2014
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 As provided for by Hungarian law, the parents had joint custody of their son. His place of habitual residence was in Hungary, where he […]
Szalas v. Szabo,  O.J. No. 3632 (Gen. Div.)
The mother and father, Hungarian nationals, were married in Hungary in 1980. After they separated, the mother, with the consent of the father, took custody of their two children, a […]
Viragh v. Foldes, 415 Mass 96, 612 N.E.2d 241 (Mass. 1993)
The children, two boys, were 6 and 8 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They had spent all of their lives in Hungary. The parents were divorced, the […]
1Ob648/92 (1Ob649/92), Oberster Gerichtshof
The two children concerned were born to married parents. Since the summer of 1989 they lived with their maternal grandparents in Hungary. The grandmother applied for custody of the children. […]