Marjet Groenleer
Alexander Daniel Leuftink
LINK Lawyers
Smeets Gijbels
Re V.-B. (Abduction: Custody Rights) [1999] 2 FLR 192
Appeal dismissed and application dismissed; there had not been a breach of actually exercised rights of custody.
X. (Stichting Bureau Jeugdzorg {BJA}) against Y. (the mother) (14 April 2000, ELRO nr: AA5523 Zaaknr.R99/111HR)
Challenge to legality dismissed; the removal of the child was not wrongful as the rights possessed by the BJA did not amount to rights of custody. The application was therefore rejected.
DZ v YVAMVD, RFamA 2270/13
http://elyon1.court.gov.il/files/13/700/022/t04/13022700.t04.pdf
V.L. B-1572-09
Z A and BY and in the matter of K (a minor) [2020] NIFam 9
The parents married in 2013 and had a child, K. The defendant is the biological mother of the child and the plaintiff is recognised as a parent on the birth certificate. The plaintiff is a Dutch national, the defendant from Northern Ireland. The relationship between the parents was characterised by domestic violence and both women […]
ECLI: NL: RBDHA: 2020: 2861
