Rechsteiner v. Kendell (1999), 1 R.F.L. 5th 101 (Ont. C.A.)
Return ordered; appeal on Convention issues dismissed and appeal on costs order allowed.
Parsons v. Styger (1989), 67 O.R. (2d) 1 (L.J.S.C.), aff’d (1989) 67 O.R. (2d) 11 (C.A.)
Application allowed; counter-application dismissed. The child was ordered to be returned forthwith to California. If the mother accompanied the child, he would remain in her temporary custody in Los Angeles County with reasonable access to the father, pending any other interim or permanent order of a California court having jurisdiction.
Pollastro v. Pollastro [1999] 45 R.F.L. (4th) 404 (Ont. C.A.)
Appeal allowed and return refused; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of harm had been met.
Lozinska v. Bielawski (1998), 56 O.T.C. 59 (Gen. Div. (Div. Ct.))
Application for leave to appeal dismissed and return ordered. More than one year had elapsed since the wrongful removal but it had not been proved that the child was settled in its new environment.
Hoskins v. Boyd, (1997) 28 RFL (4th) 221
Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of psychological harm had not been met.
N? de r?le : 06/4518/A r?f, Tribunal de Premi?re Instance de Bruxelles
Retour ordonn?.
6Ob134/13v, Oberster Gerichtshof
http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Justiz/JJT_20130828_OGH0002_0060OB00134_13V0000_000/JJT_20130828_OGH0002_0060OB00134_13V0000_000.html
6Ob75/13t, Oberster Gerichtshof
http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokument.wxe?Abfrage=Justiz&Dokumentnummer=JJT_20130422_OGH0002_0060OB00075_13T0000_000
3Ob210/05m, Oberster Gerichtshof
6Ob86/13k, Oberster Gerichtshof
http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Justiz/JJT_20130508_OGH0002_0060OB00086_13K0000_000/JJT_20130508_OGH0002_0060OB00086_13K0000_000.html