M. v. M., 18 August 2000, Jerusalem Family Court
Article 15 declaration refused; the removal was not wrongful as no rights of custody had been breached.
Abbott v. Abbott, 542 F.3d 1081 (5th Cir. 2008)
http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/07/07-50967-CV0.wpd.pdf
In re Coffield, 96 Ohio App. 3d 52, 644 N.E.2d 662 (1994)
Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the standard required under Articles 13(1)(b) and 12(2) had not been met.
Loos v. Manuel, 278 N.J. Super. 607, 651 A.2d 1077 (Ch. Div. 1994)
Return refused; the foster parents did not enjoy any rights of custody at the moment of the removal.
Copeland v. Copeland, 134 F.3d 362 (4th Cir. Feb. 6, 1998)
http://www.hcch.net/incadat/fullcase/0239.htm
Duran v. Beaumont, 534 F.3d 142, (2nd Cir. 2008);
http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/71f93df7-ea3b-4c38-9c7c-8e1ee722f563/5/doc/06-5614-cv_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/71f93df7-ea3b-4c38-9c7c-8e1ee722f563/5/hilite/
Koch v. Koch, 416 F. Supp. 2d 645, (E.D. Wis., 2006)
Return ordered; the removal was wrongful, the children being habitually resident in Germany at the time they were taken.
Koch v. Koch, 450 F.3d 703 (2006 7th Cir.)
Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the children were habitually resident in Germany at the time of the removal, albeit the primary reasoning of the trial court was not followed.
Rodriguez v. Nat’l Ctr. for Missing & Exploited Children, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5658 (D.D.C., Mar. 31, 2005)
Constitutional claims dismissed, claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act dismissed, claim of a conspiracy based on racial or other class-based animus dismissed and writ of mandamus denied.
Bekier v. Bekier, 248 F.3d 1051 (11th Cir. 2001)
Application to appeal dismissed and return order upheld. The prior return of the child rendered an appeal moot.
