ZA v NA [2012] EWCA Civ 1396, [2012] 3 F.C.R. 421
http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed103649
Clarke v. Carson [1996] 1 NZFLR 349
https://www.incadat.com/en/case/947
M. v. H., 30 June 1994, transcript, District Court of New Zealand at Christchurch
http://www.hcch.net/incadat/fullcase/0247.htm
Simpson v Hamilton [2020] NZSC 42
M v. M [2012] NZFLR 429
http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/2012/874.html
APN v. TMH (Child Abduction: Grave Risk and Human Rights) [2010] NZFLR 463
C. v. T.
Application dismissed; the child was not habitually resident in Australia on the relevant date.
K.S. v. L.S. [2003] 3 NZLR 837
Appeal allowed and return ordered; a grave risk of harm had not been established to the standard required under the Convention. The trial court had moreover erred in the exercise of its discretion.
White v. Northumberland [2006] NZFLR 1105
Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the child’s objections did not satisfy the standard required under Article 13(2) of the Convention.
Secretary for Justice (New Zealand Central Authority) v. H.J. [2007] 2 NZLR 289
Appeal dismissed and return refused; the removal was wrongful but the children were now settled in their new environment and it would not be appropriate for them to be returned.
