Family Application 042721/06 G.K. v Y.K.
Family Application 2059/07 Ploni vs. Almonit
DZ v YVAMVD, RFamA 2270/13
http://elyon1.court.gov.il/files/13/700/022/t04/13022700.t04.pdf
LM v MM Nevo, RFamA 2338/09
Appeal dismissed and return order upheld; the retention was wrongful the child being habitually resident in France at the relevant date, and none of the exceptions had been established to the standard required under the Hague Convention.
J. v. B., 25 April 2007, Court for Family Matters, Beersheva
Removal wrongful and return ordered to a Member State other than the State of the child’s habitual residence; none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.
3052/99 S. v. S.
Appeal allowed and return refused; decision of the trial court, that the standard required by Article 13(2) had not been met, restored.
F v F, MA 2898/92 [1992] IsrSC (unreported)
Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the removal was wrongful, being in breach of the father’s right of custody.
C. v. C., 23 March 1995, Be’er Sheva District Court
Application dismissed; the removal was not wrongful since the child was habitually resident in Israel at the relevant date.
A.S. v. P.S. (Child Abduction) [1998] 2 IR 244
Appeal allowed and return ordered with undertakings given; the standard of proof required under Article 13(1)(a) and 13(1)(b) had not been met.
Nottinghamshire County Council v. K.B. and K.B. [2011] IESC 48
http://courts.ie/Judgments.nsf/0/775840E6393C0593802579670057F84C
