14-Dec
Supreme Court of Finland 1995:110, S95/301
Retention wrongful but return refused; the standard required under Article 13(1)(a) had been proved to show that the father had consented to the children living in Finland.
Supreme Court of Finland 1996:151, S96/2489
Return ordered; the removal was wrongful and the standard of harm required under Article 13(1)(b) had not been made out.
County Court of Zagreb, No. 15 Gž Ob-1264 / 16-2 of 11 October 2016
Municipal Court of Rijeka, No. R1Ob-649/16 of 16 June 2017
Couderc v. Czech Republic, Requ?te n?54429/00
V.L. B-1572-09
N. v. O. [1999] 1 HKLRD 68
Application dismissed; the child was not habitually resident in Luxembourg at the relevant date.
B.L.W. v. B.W.L. [2007] 2 HKLRD 193
https://www.incadat.com/en/case/879
L. E. A. C. s/ Restituci?n Internacional