Appeal dismissed and application dismissed; the retention was not wrongful as the child had never acquired a habitual residence in Belgium.
Removal wrongful and return ordered to a Member State other than the State of the child’s habitual residence; none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under […]
A l’unanimit?: Annulation pour inconstitutionnalit? (violation des art. 6(2), 2(1) et 103(1) de la Loi fondamentale allemande (Grundgesetz)) des d?cisions de premi?re instance et d’appel ordonnant le retour de l’enfant. […]