Legal Case
Re M. (Abduction: Psychological Harm) [1997] 2 FLR 690
Appeal dismissed and return refused; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate the children would face a grave risk of psychological harm had been
Knowledge Base
Probably the world's biggest database for parental abduction.
Refine Search:
Language
Resource Type
Resource Topics
Countries
Year Published
Keyword Search:
Results:
Legal Case
Re S. (Abduction: Acquiescence) [1998] 2 FLR 115
Appeal allowed and return refused; the father had acquiesced in the retention of his son. The court exercised its discretion not to order the return
Legal Case
Re P. (A Minor) (Abduction: Acquiescence) [1998] 2 FLR 835
Appeal dismissed and return ordered, undertakings offered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(a) to indicate consent or acquiescence of the removal had not been met.
Legal Case
Re S. (A Minor), 20 August 1996, High Court, transcript; The Independent, 14 October 1996
Return ordered; the children were habitually resident in Canada at the relevant date.
Legal Case
Whitley v. Whitley 1992 GWD 22-1248
Appeal dismissed and return of the children to the United States ordered; the evidence did not support a finding of a grave risk of harm
Legal Case
Re B. (Abduction: Children’s Objections) [1998] 1 FLR 667
Removal wrongful but return refused on the basis of the children’s objections.
Legal Case
Re H. and Others (Minors) (Abduction: Acquiescence) [1998] AC 72
Appeal allowed and return ordered; Article 13(1)(a) was not established.
Legal Case
??zmen c. Turquie (Requ?te No 28110/08)
http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-115009
Legal Case
??v?s c. Turquie (Requ?te No 42981/04)
http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=001-94933
Legal Case