
Re S. (Abduction: Acquiescence) [1998] 2 FLR 115
Appeal allowed and return refused; the father had acquiesced in the retention of his son. The court exercised its discretion not to order the return
Appeal allowed and return refused; the father had acquiesced in the retention of his son. The court exercised its discretion not to order the return
Appeal dismissed and return ordered, undertakings offered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(a) to indicate consent or acquiescence of the removal had not been met.
Return ordered; the children were habitually resident in Canada at the relevant date.
Appeal dismissed and return of the children to the United States ordered; the evidence did not support a finding of a grave risk of harm
Removal wrongful but return refused on the basis of the children’s objections.
Appeal allowed and return ordered; Article 13(1)(a) was not established.
http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-115009
http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=001-94933
http://jumpcgi.bger.ch/cgi-bin/JumpCGI?id=13.07.2012_5A_479/2012