Legal Case
Sentencia nº 120/2002 (Sala Primera); N?mero de Registro 129/1999. Recurso de amparo
“Amparo” granted by the Constitutional Court which mandated the Court of Appeals to decide on the merits of the appeal.
Knowledge Base
Probably the world's biggest database for parental abduction.
Refine Search:
Language
Resource Type
Resource Topics
Countries
Year Published
Keyword Search:
Results:
Legal Case
Central Authority, RSA v. OCI [2010] JOL 25947 (GSJ)
http://www.justice.gov.za/hague/caselaw/2010_iguwa_10-15111.pdf
Legal Case
Family Advocate, Cape Town, and another v EM 2009 (5) SA 420 (C)
Retention wrongful and return ordered, subject to conditions; none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.
Legal Case
Central Authority of the Republic of South Africa and Another v B 2012 (2) SA 296 (GSJ)
Retention wrongful but return refused in the light of the child’s objections.
Legal Case
KG v. CB & others (748/11) [2012] ZASCA 17
http://www.justice.gov.za/sca/judgments/sca_2012/sca2012-017.pdf
Legal Case
Pennello v. Pennello [2003] 1 All SA 716 (N)
Appeal allowed and return refused; Article 13(1)(b) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.
Legal Case
Re G. (Abduction) (Rights of Custody) [2002] 2 FLR 703
Article 15 declaration granted; the removal was wrongful being in breach of inchoate rights of custody.
Legal Case
L?pez Gui? v. Slovakia (Application No 10280/12)
http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-144355
Legal Case
Maire v. Portugal, Requ?te no 48206/99, (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 13
Breach of Article 8 of the ECHR and award of damages. The Portuguese authorities had failed to take sufficient or adequate measures to ensure respect
Legal Case
Serghides c. Pologne (Requ?te No 31515/04)
http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-101487