Challenge to legality dismissed; the removal of the child was not wrongful as the rights possessed by the BJA did not amount to rights of
Appeal allowed and return ordered; the retention was wrongful and none of the exceptions had been established to the standard required under the Convention.
Appel rejet? et retour refus? ; le d?placement de l’enfant ?tait illicite mais les conditions requises pour appliquer l’article 13(1)(b) ?taient r?unies.
https://www.incadat.com/en/case/1323
http://elyon1.court.gov.il/files/14/300/019/z06/14019300.z06.pdf