Legal Case
Cass Civ 1?re (pourvoi n? 05-14646 )
Challenge dismissed; the Cour d’Appel had been correct in finding that none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.
Knowledge Base
Probably the world's biggest database for parental abduction.
Refine Search:
Language
Resource Type
Resource Topics
Countries
Year Published
Keyword Search:
Results:
Legal Case
CA Grenoble, 4 juin 2008, No de RG 08/01779
Appeal dismissed. The removal was wrongful and the exceptions of the Convention inapplicable.
Legal Case
CA Aix-en-Provence, 30 novembre 2006, No de RG 06/03661
Recours rejet? et retour refus?. Le retour exposait l’enfant ? un risque grave.
Legal Case
Cass. Civ 1?re, 22 juin 1999, No de RG 98-17902
Challenge to legality dismissed; Article 13(1)(b) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.
Legal Case
Cass Civ 1?re 16 juillet 1993, N? de pourvoi 92-19618
Challenge to legality dismissed; the mother’s removal was wrongful but she had subsequently been awarded custody.
Legal Case
CA Douai, 24 mai 2007, No de RG 06/03280
Recours rejet? et retour refus?; le d?placement ?tait illicite mais l’exception de l’article 13(1)(b) ?tait applicable.
Legal Case
Supreme Court of Finland 1995:110, S95/301
Retention wrongful but return refused; the standard required under Article 13(1)(a) had been proved to show that the father had consented to the children living
Legal Case
Supreme Court of Finland 1996:151, S96/2489
Return ordered; the removal was wrongful and the standard of harm required under Article 13(1)(b) had not been made out.