
Legal Case
Supreme Court of Finland 1995:110, S95/301
Retention wrongful but return refused; the standard required under Article 13(1)(a) had been proved to show that the father had consented to the children living
Retention wrongful but return refused; the standard required under Article 13(1)(a) had been proved to show that the father had consented to the children living
Return ordered; the removal was wrongful and the standard of harm required under Article 13(1)(b) had not been made out.
Application dismissed; the child was not habitually resident in Luxembourg at the relevant date.