Knowledge Base
Probably the world's biggest database for parental abduction.
Refine Search:
Language
Resource Type
Resource Topics
Countries
Year Published
Keyword Search:
Results:
Office of the Children’s Lawyer v. Balev, 2018 SCC 16
https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/17064/index.do
Adkins v. Adkins, 2009 BCSC 337
http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/SC/09/03/2009BCSC0337.htm
2008 QCSC 4762, Superior Court of Qu?bec (District of Montreal), No: 500-04-048266-085
Return ordered; the removal was wrongful and no exception had been established.
2008 QCSC 5320, Superior Court of Qu?bec (District of Hull)
Mother’s application allowed and immediate return of the children to Greece ordered. The children were wrongfully retained and no exception had been established.
Hewstan v. Hewstan, [2001] B.C.J. No. 590 (B.C.S.C.) (Q.L.)
Return ordered; the removal was wrongful and none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.
F.C. c. P.A., Droit de la famille – 08728, Cour sup?rieure de Chicoutimi, 28 mars 2008, N?150-04-004667-072
Application dismissed and return refused; the removal was not wrongful and the child was in any event settled in his new environment.
T.B. c. M.T., Cour sup?rieure du Qu?bec, 4 novembre 2003, n? 200-04-011942-032, 200-04-011658-034
Retour ordonn?; le d?placement ?tait illicite et aucune des exceptions conventionnelles n’?taient applicables.
Rechsteiner v. Kendell (1999), 1 R.F.L. 5th 101 (Ont. C.A.)
Return ordered; appeal on Convention issues dismissed and appeal on costs order allowed.