Application allowed; counter-application dismissed. The child was ordered to be returned forthwith to California. If the mother accompanied the child, he would remain in her
Appeal allowed and return refused; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of harm had been
Application for leave to appeal dismissed and return ordered. More than one year had elapsed since the wrongful removal but it had not been proved
Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of psychological harm had
http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Justiz/JJT_20130828_OGH0002_0060OB00134_13V0000_000/JJT_20130828_OGH0002_0060OB00134_13V0000_000.html
http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokument.wxe?Abfrage=Justiz&Dokumentnummer=JJT_20130422_OGH0002_0060OB00075_13T0000_000
http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Justiz/JJT_20130508_OGH0002_0060OB00086_13K0000_000/JJT_20130508_OGH0002_0060OB00086_13K0000_000.html
Appeal dismissed and application dismissed; the removal did not breach any rights of custody.