Knowledge Base
Probably the world's biggest database for parental abduction.
Refine Search:
Language
Resource Type
Resource Topics
Countries
Year Published
Keyword Search:
Results:
6Ob86/13k, Oberster Gerichtshof
http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Justiz/JJT_20130508_OGH0002_0060OB00086_13K0000_000/JJT_20130508_OGH0002_0060OB00086_13K0000_000.html
1Ob532/92, Oberster Gerichtshof
Appeal dismissed and application dismissed; the removal did not breach any rights of custody.
1Ob220/02p, Oberster Gerichtshof
Appeal allowed: the trial judges had not considered whether, under Article 3, the children had acquired a habitual residence in Australia.
1Ob51/02k, Oberster Gerichtshof
Le recours du p?re est accueilli ; l’instance d’appel n’aurait pas d? supposer que le retour des enfants impliquait qu’ils soient confi?s ? un p?re
S. v. S., 25 May 1998, transcript (Unofficial Translation), Austrian Regional Civil Court, Graz
Appeal allowed and case remitted to the District Civil Court of Graz to rule on the father’s application for access.
6Ob183/97y, Oberster Gerichtshof
Recours rejet? ; confirmation de la d?cision refusant le retour. Le d?placement ?tait illicite, mais les conditions d’application de l’article 13 alin?a 1 b ?taient
Arthur & Secretary, Department of Family & Community Services and Anor [2017] FamCAFC 111, (2017) FLC 93-781
https://www.incadat.com/en/case/11
State Central Authority & Quang [2009] FamCA 1038
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FamCA/2009/1038.html