Legal Case
Sieger & Department of Communities and Justice [2020] FamCAFC 172
Grave Risk – Art. 13(1)(b) The 1980 Convention states that a court may refuse to order the return of the child if it would ‘expose
Knowledge Base
Probably the world's biggest database for parental abduction.
Refine Search:
Language
Resource Type
Resource Topics
Countries
Year Published
Keyword Search:
Results:
Legal Case
Bakker v. Bakker [2020] BCSC 1620
Removal and Retention – Arts 3 and 12 After applying an objective test the court found that an agreement was made between the parties to
Legal Case
[A.R.P.] v [Uni?o], Recurso Especial No 1.723.068 – RS
The child was born in 2011 in Spain of a Brazilian mother and Spanish father. In 2013, the family lived in Brazil for a while.
Legal Case
OLG Karlsruhe 2 UF 200 19 – 25 June 2020
Karlsruhe Local Court had obligated the mother, in its order dated 14 November 2019 (File No: 2 F 1701/19, INCADAT Case No: 1468) to effect,
Legal Case
OLG Karlsruhe 2 UF 200 19 (Bes. Haftbef.)- 25 June 2020
The mother had been ordered, by means of an order issued by Karlsruhe Local Court dated 14 November 2019 (File No: 2 F 1701/19, INCADAT
Legal Case
Z A and BY and in the matter of K (a minor) [2020] NIFam 9
The parents married in 2013 and had a child, K. The defendant is the biological mother of the child and the plaintiff is recognised as
Legal Case
LRR v COL [2020] NZCA 209
The mother and the father were living in Australia with their son, H. Following the break-down of their relationship, the mother moved to New Zealand
Legal Case
Sabeahat v. Sabihat FS-18-0099
Interpretation of the Convention The taking parent bears the evidentiary burden to satisfy the court that the circumstances of the case qualify under Article 13(1)(b)