
Re A. and D. (Children) [2011] EWCA Civ 265
Habitual Residence – Art. 3 The mother’s primary argument was that the President had failed to consider that the agreement for the children to go
Habitual Residence – Art. 3 The mother’s primary argument was that the President had failed to consider that the agreement for the children to go
The return application concerned a girl born in 2004 in Romania to Romanian parents. In November 2005, the parents divorced and custody of the child
The case concerned a child born in London in 1999. After the parents’ separation in 2004, an English Court awarded them shared custody of the
The case concerned a child born in Germany in 2001. Shortly after she was born, the father, a Portuguese national, was sentenced to a jail
Rights of Access – Art. 21 The mother used this provision to enable her to obtain legal aid in Quebec, as that province’s Central Authority
The proceedings related to a child born in August 2009 to a French mother from the overseas d?partement of the island of R?union and a
Brussels IIa Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003) The CJEU noted that Regulation No 2201/2003 had set up a system whereby,
Habitual Residence – Art. 3 For the Convention to apply the applicant father had to show that the children had acquired a habitual residence in
The proceedings related to a child born on 23 November 2008 to unmarried parents. On 29 May 2009, the child was taken from the United
The application concerned a child born in 2007 in Norway to an Australian mother and a Norwegian father. The parents had married in Australia in