
Sealed Appellant v. Sealed Appellee, 394 F.3d 338 (5th Cir. 2004)
The children were 2 1/2 years and 6 months old at the time of the alleged wrongful removal. They had until then spent all of

The children were 2 1/2 years and 6 months old at the time of the alleged wrongful removal. They had until then spent all of

The application related to two children, both boys, who were aged 12 and almost 9 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. The parents

Habitual Residence – Art. 3 For the father’s application to be valid it had to be shown first that the child was habitually resident in

The proceedings related to two children, one born in Israel in 1998, the other in England in 2000. The parents, who were Israeli nationals, moved

Acquiescence – Art. 13(1)(a) The fact that the father had not seen the girls for the past year and a half, even though he had

The child, a girl, was 1 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. Her parents were not married but lived together in New

The application related to a child born in 1999. The parents were married and the family lived in Italy. In June 2002 the mother took

The application related to a 10 year old girl who had been born to an American father and an Irish mother. The family home was

Human Rights – Art. 20 The step-sister argued that the trial judge had erred in referring solely to the human rights of the abducted child

The child, a boy, was 5 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents met over the internet in 1998. The child was