Legal Case
J.E.A. v. C.L.M. (2002), 220 D.L.R. (4th) 577 (N.S.C.A.)
The mother and father were married in the United States in 1990. Their child, a girl, was born in January 1992. The mother and father
Knowledge Base
Probably the world's biggest database for parental abduction.
Refine Search:
Language
Resource Type
Resource Topics
Countries
Year Published
Keyword Search:
Results:
Legal Case
Silverman v. Silverman, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8313
The children were 8 and 5 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. The parents were married and the family had lived together in
Legal Case
Janine Claire Genish-Grant and Director-General Department of Community Services [2002] FamCA 346, (2002) FLC 93-111; 29 Fam LR 51
The parties lived at various places in Australia from 1990 until March/April 1995 when they went to live in Israel. The mother returned to Australia
Legal Case
CA Aix en Provence, 8 octobre 2002, No de RG 02/14917
The children, 5 girls, were aged 13, 10, 8, 7 and 5 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. At the time of the
Legal Case
Tribunal for Children, Brescia, 16 May 2002, Case No. 209/02 RGCC et n. 1198 CRON.
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 The Italian Court recognized the validity of the father’s request for return since, as a result of the judgment
Legal Case
O. v. O. 2002 SC 430
The children were aged 9 and 7 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents were married in Ireland in January 1981
Legal Case
?.L.K, 5. April 2002, 16. afdeling, B-409-02
The child, a girl, was 7 years old at the time of the alleged wrongful retention. She was born in England in 1994 and lived
Legal Case
P. v. P.
The children, two girls, were aged 7 and almost 3, at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. The children and mother are German nationals.
Legal Case
Cass Civ 1?re 19 mars 2002, N? de pourvoi 00-17.692
The child was aged 6 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. Until the time of the removal he had been living in
Legal Case
Tribunal for Children, Palermo, 28 March 2002, Case No. 8/2002 Civ. Reg. gen. – N. 1596 Reg. Cron.
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 The court ruled that the removal of the child had violated the mother’s exclusive right to decide the chld’s