
Bundesgericht, II. Zivilabteilung (Federal Supreme Court, 2nd Civil Chamber) Decision of 13 September 2001, 5P.160/2001/min
The child, a girl, was two and a half years old at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She had until then lived all
The child, a girl, was two and a half years old at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She had until then lived all
The children, 2 boys, were born on 7 April 1999 and 17 May 2000 in Sydney, Australia. The parents were not married but had been
The children, 3 boys, aged 8 _, 6 _ et 3 _, were living in Spain at the time of the alleged wrongful retention. The
The children, a boy and a girl, were aged 11 _ and 10 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. They had lived in
The child, a boy, was aged almost 4 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents, both Belgian nationals, had lived in
The child, a boy, was 5 years of age at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. He had lived in both Sweden and England.
The children, a boy born in 1985 and a boy born in 1995, had their habitual residence in Belgium. Under an order made by a
The child, a boy, was 2 _ years old at the time of the alleged wrongful removal. His parents were married but separated. On 5
Habitual Residence – Art. 3 The nature of the child’s stay in New Zealand was the subject of dispute. The mother argued that it was
The child, a girl, was aged 3 _ and living in Cyprus at the time of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents had divorced in