
Chan v. Chow (2001), 199 D.L.R. (4th) 478 (B.C.C.A.)
Habitual Residence – Art. 3 Habitual residence is a question of fact to be decided by reference to all the circumstances of the case. A
Habitual Residence – Art. 3 Habitual residence is a question of fact to be decided by reference to all the circumstances of the case. A
L’enfant, un petit gar?on n? en septembre 1998, ?tait ?g? de 2 ans ? la date du non-retour dont le caract?re illicite ?tait all?gu?. Ses
The child, a girl, was 6 years old at the date of alleged wrongful retention. From March 1997 to 1998 she lived in Tennessee (USA)
The child, a boy, was almost 3 years old at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. From his birth in February 1998 to December
The four children, two boys and female twins were aged 13, 10 and 8 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They were all
Habitual Residence – Art. 3 The issue for the court was whether the child was habitually resident in England on 10 February 2000, the date
The children, a girl and a boy, were aged 13 and 6 respectively at the date of the retention of the girl and at the
The child, a boy, was 9 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had lived in Canada all his life. The parents
Non-Convention Issues The appeal was dismissed. It was accepted that the trial judge had not misdirected himself or made an error of law, while his
The child, a boy, was about approximately 2 _ at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. The child was born while the parents were