
III. ?S 440/2000 DAOUD / DAOUD
The child, a girl, was 8 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. She had lived in Israel for the majority of her life.
The child, a girl, was 8 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. She had lived in Israel for the majority of her life.
The child, a boy, was aged 5 _ at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had until then been living in Australia. The
The parents were married and lived together in Norway until 1998. The mother then moved to Iceland with their three children, the oldest being a
The children, two girls and a boy, were approximately 8 1/2, 4 1/2 and 4 1/2 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful retention.
La demande concernait trois enfants de parents mari?s. La famille avait v?cu au Canada de 1990 ? 1999. La m?re, d’origine anglaise, avait rencontr? un
The child, a girl, was approximately 9 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in Hong Kong all of her life.
Rights of Access – Art. 21 The court adopted the approach taken in Bromley v. Bromley, which held that the Convention provided no remedy where
The children, both girls, were four and thirteen at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. They had lived in the United States for the
The child, a girl, was 1 _ years old at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in Italy all her life.
The application related to three girls aged 13, 11 and 8 at the date of judgment. The parents were Norwegian nationals but lived in New