
Payne v. Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 166; [2001] Fam. 473
Non-Convention Issues The appeal was dismissed. It was accepted that the trial judge had not misdirected himself or made an error of law, while his
Non-Convention Issues The appeal was dismissed. It was accepted that the trial judge had not misdirected himself or made an error of law, while his
The child, a boy, was about approximately 2 _ at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. The child was born while the parents were
The child, a girl, was 8 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. She had lived in Israel for the majority of her life.
The child, a boy, was aged 5 _ at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had until then been living in Australia. The
The parents were married and lived together in Norway until 1998. The mother then moved to Iceland with their three children, the oldest being a
The children, two girls and a boy, were approximately 8 1/2, 4 1/2 and 4 1/2 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful retention.
La demande concernait trois enfants de parents mari?s. La famille avait v?cu au Canada de 1990 ? 1999. La m?re, d’origine anglaise, avait rencontr? un
The child, a girl, was approximately 9 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in Hong Kong all of her life.
Rights of Access – Art. 21 The court adopted the approach taken in Bromley v. Bromley, which held that the Convention provided no remedy where
The children, both girls, were four and thirteen at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. They had lived in the United States for the