Legal Case
Donofrio v. Burrell, 2000 S.L.T. 1051
The application related to two girls, aged 10 and 8 1/2 at the date of the hearing. The parents divorced in Canada in 1991, a
Menu
The application related to two girls, aged 10 and 8 1/2 at the date of the hearing. The parents divorced in Canada in 1991, a
Rights of Access – Art. 21 Under Regulation 25(4) of the Family Law (Child Abduction Convention) Regulations, which implements the Hague Convention into Australian Law,
The child, a girl, was 8 _ months at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in the United States since birth.
The child, a boy, was almost 2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents were married and had joint rights of custody.
Non-Convention Issues The mother argued that the trial judge had erred in making a return order since under Sharia rules that would lead to the
The child, a boy, was 1 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had lived in England since his birth in the
The child who was aged approximately 1 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal was born in France to a Canadian mother. On
The child, a boy, was 12 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents, both orthodox Jews, were married. The child lived
The case related to a boy aged 4 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents were separated and had joint rights of
L’enfant avait la double nationalit? austro-am?ricaine. Les parents ?taient mari?s et avaient d’abord v?cu avec l’enfant ? St Petersburg (USA) avant de s’installer en Autriche
Our goal is to empower individuals around the world through AI technology as a tool to find and reconnect with their families.
By using our site, you agree to our privacy policy and terms.
© 2024 | 740 JARVIS DR. MH, CA 95037 | FIND MY PARENT, Inc., a CA PUBLIC CHARITY, C4616619.