
B. v. UK [2000] 1 FLR 1
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 The father complained that under Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 8 of the European Convention that, because
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 The father complained that under Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 8 of the European Convention that, because
The children, a boy and a girl, were 6 1/2 and 3 1/2 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They had lived
The father, an Italian national, and the mother, a Canadian immigrant who was born in Italy, married in 1990 and resided in Italy during their
The application related to two girls, aged 10 and 8 1/2 at the date of the hearing. The parents divorced in Canada in 1991, a
Rights of Access – Art. 21 Under Regulation 25(4) of the Family Law (Child Abduction Convention) Regulations, which implements the Hague Convention into Australian Law,
The child, a girl, was 8 _ months at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in the United States since birth.
The child, a boy, was almost 2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents were married and had joint rights of custody.
Non-Convention Issues The mother argued that the trial judge had erred in making a return order since under Sharia rules that would lead to the
The child, a boy, was 1 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had lived in England since his birth in the
The child who was aged approximately 1 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal was born in France to a Canadian mother. On