Legal Case
Re D. (Abduction: Custody Rights) [1999] 2 FLR 626
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 The mother adduced expert evidence of Zimbabwe law, in particular s. 5(1) of the Guardianship of Minors Act, which
Menu
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 The mother adduced expert evidence of Zimbabwe law, in particular s. 5(1) of the Guardianship of Minors Act, which
Human Rights – Art. 20 The Supreme Court rejected the finding of the court of appeal noting that there was no evidence that a parent
Objections of the Child to a Return – Art. 13(2) The court accepted existing Australian case law that ordinarily the relevant objection for the purposes
The children, a boy and a girl, were almost 7 and 4 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They had lived in Canada
The case concerned two children born in 1993 and 1995. The family lived in Sweden and the parents had joint custody. The parents separated a
The child, a girl, was 4 months old at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. Her parents were not married however both parents possessed
The child, a girl, was 8 at the time of the alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in Norway all of her life. The mother
The child, a girl, was 5 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. She was born in Spain. Her parents were not married. The
The children, two girls and a boy, were 13, 3 and 10 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. They had lived in
The child, a boy, was 2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had lived in New Zealand all of his life. The
Our goal is to empower individuals around the world through AI technology as a tool to find and reconnect with their families.
By using our site, you agree to our privacy policy and terms.
© 2024 | 740 JARVIS DR. MH, CA 95037 | FIND MY PARENT, Inc., a CA PUBLIC CHARITY, C4616619.