Legal Case
?.L.K. 16. november 1998, 14. afd., B-2805-98
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 The court noted that the parents had joint rights of custody and that the mother’s removal of the child
Knowledge Base
Probably the world's biggest database for parental abduction.
Refine Search:
Language
Resource Type
Resource Topics
Countries
Year Published
Keyword Search:
Results:
Legal Case
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 2 BvR 1206/98, 29 October 1998
The children, a boy and a girl, were 6 2/3 and 3 respectively at the date of the first alleged wrongful removal. They had until
Legal Case
Toren v. Toren, 26 F. Supp. 2d 240 (D. Mass. 1998)
The children were 7 and 4 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. They had lived in both Israel and the United States. In
Legal Case
562 f 4374/98, Familiengericht M?nchen (Family Court of Munich) (Germany), 23 October 1998
The child, a boy, was 1 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. He had lived in both the United States and Germany. The
Legal Case
In re C.L. (a minor); J.S. v. C.L., transcript, 25 August 1998
The child was 3 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents were not married but both had rights of custody. The child
Legal Case
Decision of 4 September 1998 [1998] R.D.F. 701
The children, both boys, were 12 and 4 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They had lived in Canada and Greece. The parents
Legal Case
Re S. (Abduction: Return into Care) [1999] 1 FLR 843
Grave Risk – Art. 13(1)(b) It was argued that the allegations of sexual abuse were of such a nature to activate the Article 13(1)(b) exception.
Legal Case
Blattner v. Dietschi, No. 98-2-14708-9 KNT (Wash. Super. Ct. July 29, 1998)
The child, a boy, was nearly 7 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had lived in Switzerland all of his life. The
Legal Case
Mozes v. Mozes, 19 F. Supp. 2d 1108 (C.D. Cal. 1998)
The children, two girls and a boy, were approximately 8 1/2, 4 1/2 and 4 1/2 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful retention.
Legal Case
2 BvR 1206/98, Bundesverfassungsgericht, 17 August 1998
Procedural Matters The Federal Constitutional Court ruled that the constitutional complaint filed by the father was admissible; this justified the issuance of the provisional measure