The child, a boy, was 1 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. He had lived in both the United States and Germany. The
The child was 3 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents were not married but both had rights of custody. The child
The children, both boys, were 12 and 4 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They had lived in Canada and Greece. The parents
Grave Risk – Art. 13(1)(b) It was argued that the allegations of sexual abuse were of such a nature to activate the Article 13(1)(b) exception.
The child, a boy, was nearly 7 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had lived in Switzerland all of his life. The
The children, two girls and a boy, were approximately 8 1/2, 4 1/2 and 4 1/2 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful retention.
Procedural Matters The Federal Constitutional Court ruled that the constitutional complaint filed by the father was admissible; this justified the issuance of the provisional measure
The child, a boy, was 3_ at the time of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents were married, and had joint custody but they did
The child, a boy, was 2 1/2 the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had lived in Switzerland all of his life. The parents
Our goal is to empower individuals around the world through AI technology as a tool to find and reconnect with their families.
By using our site, you agree to our privacy policy and terms.
© 2024 | 740 JARVIS DR. MH, CA 95037 | FIND MY PARENT, Inc., a CA PUBLIC CHARITY, C4616619.