
C. v. C., 25 May 1992, Tel Aviv District Court (Israel)
Aims of the Convention – Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 The Court expressed the view that it was competent to annul the decision of the

Aims of the Convention – Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 The Court expressed the view that it was competent to annul the decision of the

Interpretation of the Convention The Supreme Court emphasized that the Convention entered into force in the United States of America on 1 July 1988, i.e.,

The child, a boy, was 5 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. During his life he had moved between England and Canada.

The three children, two boys and a girl, were aged 10, 7 and 5 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents divorced

The children, both boys, were aged 6 and 4 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The boys had moved between England and

The children were 3 and 1 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. They had lived in Canada all of their lives. The

The child, a boy, was 5 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had lived in France all of his life. The

The children, a boy and a girl, were 7 and 8 years old at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents were divorced.

The child, a boy, was 1 3/4 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. He had lived in the United States all of his

The children, both girls, were aged 3 1/2 and 2 3/4 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They had lived in the United