U/EU970069, Bezirksgericht Z?rich (Zurich District Court) (Switzerland), decision of 18 April 1997
Return refused; the retention was not wrongful as the father had consented to the relocation of the child.
Kantonsgericht St.Gallen (St.Gallen Cantonal Court), decision of 10 February 1999, RF.1998.111-E2
Appeal dismissed and return refused; the removal was wrongful but on the basis of the children’s objections a return order was refused.
OL v. PQ (C-111/17 PPU)
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62017CJ0111
CA Paris, 15 f?vrier 2007, No de RG 06/17206
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&idTexte=JURITEXT000019184659&fastReqId=746730886&fastPos=1
CA Aix-en-Provence, 30 novembre 2006, No de RG 06/03661
Recours rejet? et retour refus?. Le retour exposait l’enfant ? un risque grave.
CA Grenoble, 4 juin 2008, No de RG 08/01779
Appeal dismissed. The removal was wrongful and the exceptions of the Convention inapplicable.
3Ob210/05m, Oberster Gerichtshof
A (A Child) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
Procedural Matters There was no need to for the child to be joined as a party to proceedings as the CAFCASS officer had appropriate skills to make his voice heard. […]
Monasky v Taglieri
CASE OF O.C.I. AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 49450/17)
The mother, a Romanian national, and father, an Italian national, were married and lived together in Italy. They had two children born in 2008 and 2010. On 12 June 2015 […]
English 
日本語