Hunter v. Murrow [2005] EWCA Civ 976

INCADAT legal file Hague parental abduction

Share THIS:



The child, a boy, was almost 4 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had spent his entire life in New Zealand. His parents were not married and had ended their relationship 8 months prior to the birth. Following the birth the father had regular contact with his son.
In late September 2004 the mother took the child to London. Several weeks later she advised the father that she intended to remain. On 29 October the father filed a return petition with the New Zealand Central Authority.
Return proceedings were issued in the High Court in London on 15 November. At a hearing on 16 December it was agreed that the father obtain from a competent New Zealand court a determination of his rights in relation to the child and whether the removal had been wrongful within the meaning of Articles 3 and 5.
On 21 February 2005 the Family Court of New Zealand ruled that the father had rights of custody and that the removal was wrongful. This decision was upheld by the High Court on 21 March. Notwithstanding these rulings the English High Court dismissed the father’s return application on 26 April. The father appealed.