
V.B.M. v. D.L.J. [2004] N.J. No. 321; 2004 NLCA 56
The child, a girl, was aged 5 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She was born in Canada, but six months after her
The child, a girl, was aged 5 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She was born in Canada, but six months after her
The child, a girl, was 3 years old at the time the complaint was filed. She was born in Cordoba, Argentina and initially lived there
L’affaire concernait un enfant n? en 1998. Ses parents ?taient mexicains. L’enfant avait ?galement un demi-fr?re issu du premier mariage de leur m?re. La famille
Settlement of the Child – Art. 12(2) It was argued for the mother that the 12 month time limit prescribed in Article 12 should only
The child, a girl, was 9 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents, both US citizens, were never married. They separated in
The application related to two children, both boys, who were aged 12 and almost 9 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. The parents
Questions li?es au retour de l’enfant –
Settlement of the Child – Art. 12(2) Over 4 years had elapsed between the removal of the child and the commencement of return proceedings. During
The proceedings related to two children, both girls, who were born in 1995 and 1998 and lived in France. The parents, who were not married,