
P. v. B. (No. 2) (Child Abduction: Delay) [1999] 4 IR 185; [1999] 2 ILRM 401
The child, a girl, was 5 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. She was born in Spain. Her parents were not married. The
The child, a girl, was 5 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. She was born in Spain. Her parents were not married. The
The children, two girls and a boy, were 13, 3 and 10 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. They had lived in
The child, a boy, was 2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had lived in New Zealand all of his life. The
The children, a girl and a boy, were 8 1/4 and 3 1/4 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They had lived
Habitual Residence – Art. 3 The mother sought to argue that the child had not acquired a habitual residence in Texas notwithstanding over 2 years
The father and mother, Canadian citizens, were married in Canada in 1993. Their child, a girl, was born in Canada in March 1995. In November
The children, a girl and a boy, were born in October 1987 and 1989 respectively. They had lived in the United States all of their
L’enfant, n? en juillet 1997 en Allemagne, ?tait ?g? d’un an ? la date du d?placement dont le caract?re illicite ?tait all?gu?. Le 16 juin
Removal and Retention – Arts 3 and 12 It was not seriously disputed by the mother that her actions in retaining the child were wrongful.
The case related to two young boys who had lived in the United States but were removed to Finland by their mother. The father brought