Legal Case
Re S. (Child Abduction: Delay) [1998] 1 FLR 651
The child, a girl, was nearly 10 at the date of the second alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in Germany for a majority of
Menu
The child, a girl, was nearly 10 at the date of the second alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in Germany for a majority of
Grave Risk – Art. 13(1)(b) The court distinguished the instant case from previous case law on the basis that the mother had not deliberately refused
The child, a boy, was six months old at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had lived in the United Kingdom for the
L’a?n?e des enfants en cause ?tait n?e aux Etats-Unis d’Am?rique. Alors que les parents ?taient en instance de divorce, la m?re l’emmena unilat?ralement en France.
The children, two boys, were 7 and 6 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. Until then they had lived in Argentina all
The child, a girl, was aged 2 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. Until then she had always lived in the United
The child who was aged approximately 1 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal was born in France to a Canadian mother. On
The children, both girls, were 8 and 4 1/2 at the date of the original wrongful removal. The parents were married and both enjoyed custody
The application related to a young girl born in the UAE. Her mother was British, her father a UAE national. The parents married in Sharjah
The child, a girl, was 4 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in Germany all of her life. On
Our goal is to empower individuals around the world through AI technology as a tool to find and reconnect with their families.
By using our site, you agree to our privacy policy and terms.
© 2024 | 740 JARVIS DR. MH, CA 95037 | FIND MY PARENT, Inc., a CA PUBLIC CHARITY, C4616619.