
A.S. v. E.H. & M.H. (Child Abduction) (Wrongful Removal) [1999] 4 IR 504
The child, a boy, was 1 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. The infant had lived in both England and Ireland. The parents
The child, a boy, was 1 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. The infant had lived in both England and Ireland. The parents
The children, a boy and a girl, were aged 13 and 11 1/2 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. They had lived
The child, a girl, was 2 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in both Greece and the United States,
The child, a girl, was nearly 10 at the date of the second alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in Germany for a majority of
Grave Risk – Art. 13(1)(b) The court distinguished the instant case from previous case law on the basis that the mother had not deliberately refused
The child, a boy, was six months old at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had lived in the United Kingdom for the
L’a?n?e des enfants en cause ?tait n?e aux Etats-Unis d’Am?rique. Alors que les parents ?taient en instance de divorce, la m?re l’emmena unilat?ralement en France.
The children, two boys, were 7 and 6 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. Until then they had lived in Argentina all
The child, a girl, was aged 2 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. Until then she had always lived in the United
The child who was aged approximately 1 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal was born in France to a Canadian mother. On