
Steffen F. v. Severina P., 966 F. Supp. 922 (D. Ariz 1997)
The child, a boy, was aged 1 _ at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. Prior to the removal he had lived all of
The child, a boy, was aged 1 _ at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. Prior to the removal he had lived all of
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 Under Israeli law the parents had joint rights of custody and therefore the joint right to decide the child’s
The children were 10 1/2 and 9 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents were married and both enjoyed rights of custody.
Grave Risk – Art. 13(1)(b) The Supreme Court held that the exception in Article 13(1)(b) did not apply in the present case for the following
The child, a boy, was aged about 2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents were married and had joint rights of
The child, a girl, was 1 1/3 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. She had lived in Italy all of her life. The
The child, a boy, was aged 2 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents were married. On 28 August 1996 the
The child, a boy, was approximately 7 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had lived in Germany and Ireland. The parents were
The child, a boy, was aged 7 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. He had lived in Italy all his life. The parents
The child, a girl, was 5 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in the United States all of her