Legal Case
Re M. (Abduction: Undertakings) [1995] 1 FLR 1021
The children, a boy and a girl, were 2 1/3 years and 3 months old respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They
Knowledge Base
Probably the world's biggest database for parental abduction.
Refine Search:
Language
Resource Type
Resource Topics
Countries
Year Published
Keyword Search:
Results:
Legal Case
Bordera v. Bordera 1995 SLT 1176
The child, a boy, was 8 1/4 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had lived in Spain all of his life. The
Legal Case
Re N. (Child Abduction: Jurisdiction) [1995] Fam 96
The child, a boy, was 2 _ at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had lived all of his life in California. On
Legal Case
N. v. N. (Abduction: Article 13 Defence) [1995] 1 FLR 107
The children, two boys and a girl, were ages 11, 5 and 8 1/3 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful removal and lived
Legal Case
Cass Civ 1?re 15 juin 1994, N? de pourvoi 93-19058
The child was 8 1/2 months old at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents were married and the family lived in Mexico.
Legal Case
Re B. (Child Abduction: Habitual Residence) [1994] 2 FLR 915, [1995] Fam Law 60
The child, a boy, was 1 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. On 7 December 1992 the parents, who were separated, had
Legal Case
Re G. (Abduction: Psychological Harm) [1995] 1 FLR 64, [1995] Fam Law 116
The three children were 3 1/4, 1 1/4 and 1 1/4 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. They had lived in the United
Legal Case
Boy v. Boy [1994] 12 FRNZ 517
The children, a boy and a girl, were aged 7 and 5 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They had lived in
Legal Case
Re B. (A Minor) (Abduction) [1994] 2 FLR 249, [1994] Fam Law 606
The child, a boy, was 6 1/3 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. He had lived in Western Australia all of his life.
Legal Case
Hadissi v. Hassibi, 1994 Carswell Ont 2076, [1995] WDFL 001
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 The father was exercising rights of custody at the time of the wrongful retention. Up until that time, the