
Wolfe v. Wolfe [1993] NZFLR 277
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 The court held that under the interim order when the father had care of the child he had a
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 The court held that under the interim order when the father had care of the child he had a
The children were aged 6, 5, and 3 at the date of the application for access. On 26 April 1991 the mother unilaterally took the
The children, a boy and two girls, were 7 1/3, nearly 4 and 1 3/4 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They
The child, a girl, was almost 6 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in both the United States and England.
The child, a boy, was 1 2/3 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had spent all of his life in Germany. The
The child, a girl, was 2 2/3 at the date of the application for access. Sometime after September 1990 the mother unilaterally took the child
The two children concerned were born to married parents. Since the summer of 1989 they lived with their maternal grandparents in Hungary. The grandmother applied
The children were nearly 7 and 5 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They had lived in both Ireland and Australia. The
The child, a boy, was 10 months at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. The parents were not married and the father had no
The children, both boys, were 5 1/3 and 3 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They had lived in France all of their