
Supreme Court, Civil Chamber II, E. 2011/8304 K.2011/8799
The case concerned an application for the return of a child born in 2009, who was habitually resident in Finland. The child was removed from
The case concerned an application for the return of a child born in 2009, who was habitually resident in Finland. The child was removed from
The case concerned a boy born in Israel in June 2003. The father having associated with a religious movement (Loubavitch), marital difficulties arose in the
Habitual Residence – Art. 3 The mother argued that the child’s residence had at all times been in Finland and that the time spent in
The proceedings concerned three children aged 11, 9 and 7 at the time of the proceedings. They had been born and brought up in Northern
The case concerned a child born in Turkey in 1997. After his parents’ divorce in 2001, the child was placed in his father’s sole custody,
The case concerned a child born in 2009. After her marriage to the father, the mother lived in France with the child, cohabiting with the
The proceedings related to a child born in January 2000. The child lived with her parents in Poland until August 2003, whereupon the mother took
The proceedings related to a child born in England in August 2009 to a French mother from the overseas d?partement of the island of R?union
Habitual Residence – Art. 3 The mother’s primary argument was that the President had failed to consider that the agreement for the children to go
The return application concerned a girl born in 2004 in Romania to Romanian parents. In November 2005, the parents divorced and custody of the child