
CA Paris, 30 mai 2006, No de RG 06/00395
Grave Risk – Art. 13(1)(b) The father argued that when his daughter was aged 7 she had been the victim of rape at the family
Grave Risk – Art. 13(1)(b) The father argued that when his daughter was aged 7 she had been the victim of rape at the family
L’affaire concernait un enfant d’un couple mari? d?plac? par la m?re de Pologne vers le Luxembourg ? l’insu du p?re, le 3 mai 2005. Le
The application concerned two children born on 2 May 1999 and 29 May 2000. The mother was a New Zealand citizen; the father, an Australian,
The application related to a child born in 1999. The parents were married and the family lived in Italy. In June 2002 the mother took
The application related to a girl born in Russia in April 1992. She lived in Russia with her parents until 1997 when the parents divorced.
The application related to a child born in May 2004 in Australia to an Australian mother and American father. The parents were not married. On
L’affaire concernait un petit gar?on n? au Mexique en 2004. Ses parents ?taient mari?s et vivaient au Mexique. Le 7 juin 2005, la m?re alla
The application related to three of the four children born to a couple, who, whilst married, had resided in Israel. The parents divorced in July
The application concerned two children born in Australia on 22 January 1994 and 5 February 1995 to an Australian mother and a New Zealand father.
Grave Risk – Art. 13(1)(b) Central to the finding of the High Court was the fact that in June 2005 the mother was the vicitim