
11 UF 121/03, Oberlandesgericht Hamm
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 Actual Exercise Under English law, the law of the children’s State of habitual residence, the father held rights of

Rights of Custody – Art. 3 Actual Exercise Under English law, the law of the children’s State of habitual residence, the father held rights of

The child, a boy, was 11 years old at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. His parents had not been married, and had separated

The mother and father, Canadian citizens, lived together in Canada for three years. They had one child, a boy, who was six years old at

Removal and Retention – Arts 3 and 12 – Consent – Art. 13(1)(a) The mother submitted that the father had consented to the removal and

Les trois enfants en cause ?taient n?s au Canada d’une m?re allemande et d’un p?re canadien. Apr?s trois ans de vie maritale, la m?re emmena

L’enfant, une fille, ?tait ?g?e de 3 ans _ ? la date du d?placement dont le caract?re illicite ?tait all?gu?. Les parents, d’origine turque, avaient

The child, a boy, was seven years old at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. He had lived in Scotland all of his life.

The children were aged 9, 6 and 5 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. Until then they had lived all of their lives

There were four children of the marriage, two girls and two boys. The eldest child was aged 9 at the date of the proceedings. It