
Cass Civ 1?re 19 mars 2002, N? de pourvoi 00-17.692
The child was aged 6 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. Until the time of the removal he had been living in
The child was aged 6 1/2 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. Until the time of the removal he had been living in
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 The court ruled that the removal of the child had violated the mother’s exclusive right to decide the chld’s
L’enfant, un gar?on, ?tait ?g? de pr?s de 4 ans et demi ? la date du d?placement dont le caract?re illicite ?tait all?gu?. Les parents
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 The father argued that he held rights of custody and that the removal breached those rights and was therefore
R?sidence habituelle – art. 3 Le p?re pr?tendait entre autres que l’enfant avait sa r?sidence habituelle en France. La Cour observa que l’enfant r?sidait ?
The twin children were born in England to a surrogate mother. At the date of the hearing they were 3 months old and had spent
The child, a girl, was 13 months old at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She was born in Israel and prior to the
The child, a girl, was 10 years old at the date of alleged wrongful removal. Prior to the removal she had lived in Florida with
The child, a boy, was 12 years of age at the time of the alleged wrongful retention. He had lived in England with his mother
The child, a girl, was nearly 7 years old at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in Venezuela all her life.