
Callaghan v. Thomas [2001] NZFLR 1105
Habitual Residence – Art. 3 The nature of the child’s stay in New Zealand was the subject of dispute. The mother argued that it was
Habitual Residence – Art. 3 The nature of the child’s stay in New Zealand was the subject of dispute. The mother argued that it was
The child, a girl, was aged 3 _ and living in Cyprus at the time of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents had divorced in
L’enfant, un petit gar?on n? en septembre 1998, ?tait ?g? de 2 ans ? la date du non-retour dont le caract?re illicite ?tait all?gu?. Ses
The case related to a boy aged almost 5 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents were married and had joint rights
The child, a girl, was nearly 10 years old at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in Italy all of her
The children, a boy and a girl, were aged 5 and 2 at the date of the hearing. They had both been born and brought
The child was approximately 3 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. It was disputed whether the parents were legally married. They stopped cohabiting
The mother and father, South African nationals, were married in 1993. Their child, a boy, was born in Canada in May 1995. The family returned
The application related to three children, aged almost 14, 12 and almost 10, at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. Until that moment they
The child, a girl, was aged 7 1/3 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. Her father was an Italian citizen, her mother had