
Callaghan v. Thomas [2001] NZFLR 1105
Habitual Residence – Art. 3 The nature of the child’s stay in New Zealand was the subject of dispute. The mother argued that it was

Habitual Residence – Art. 3 The nature of the child’s stay in New Zealand was the subject of dispute. The mother argued that it was

The child, a girl, was aged 3 _ and living in Cyprus at the time of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents had divorced in

L’enfant, un petit gar?on n? en septembre 1998, ?tait ?g? de 2 ans ? la date du non-retour dont le caract?re illicite ?tait all?gu?. Ses

The case related to a boy aged almost 5 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. The parents were married and had joint rights

The child, a girl, was nearly 10 years old at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in Italy all of her

The children, a boy and a girl, were aged 5 and 2 at the date of the hearing. They had both been born and brought

The child was approximately 3 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. It was disputed whether the parents were legally married. They stopped cohabiting

The mother and father, South African nationals, were married in 1993. Their child, a boy, was born in Canada in May 1995. The family returned

The application related to three children, aged almost 14, 12 and almost 10, at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. Until that moment they

The child, a girl, was aged 7 1/3 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. Her father was an Italian citizen, her mother had