Legal Case
M Ma c. EL, Droit de la famille 3451, No 500-09-007790-991
L’affaire concernait un b?b? n? fin 1998 en Ontario. En raison de graves probl?mes de sant?, l’enfant avait v?cu ? l’h?pital jusqu’? No?l 1998 et
Knowledge Base
Probably the world's biggest database for parental abduction.
Refine Search:
Language
Resource Type
Resource Topics
Countries
Year Published
Keyword Search:
Results:
Legal Case
H. v. H.
The children, a girl and a boy, were habitually resident in the United States. The parents had joint rights of custody. In late July/early August
Legal Case
Secretary For Justice v. Parker 1999 (2) ZLR 400 (H)
The children were 6 1/2 and 4 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They had lived all of their lives in England. The
Legal Case
Decision of the Supreme Court, 1 December 1999, I CKN 992/99
The proceedings related to a child born in September 1993 in Cyprus, to a Cypriot father and a Polish mother. The parents were married and
Legal Case
Secretary Attorney-General’s Department v. S.[1999] FamCA 1528
Habitual Residence – Art. 3 The court ruled that the terms of the agreement of 4 June 1996 and of the proposed consent orders did
Legal Case
Case No 5P.262/1999, 11/11/1999, Tribunal f?d?ral suisse
The children, a girl and a boy, were 6 and 2 years old respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. They had lived
Legal Case
CA Paris, 7 octobre 1999, No de RG 1999-18635
R?le des Autorit?s centrales – art. 6 – 10 –
Legal Case
Case No. C 99 4313, 11/10/1999, Arrondissement judiciaire I Courtelary-Moutier-La Neuveville
The children, three girls, were 10 _, 4 _ and 3 _ years old respectively at the date of the alleged violation of the father’s
Legal Case
Villalta v. Massie, No. 4:99cv312-RH (N.D. Fla. Oct. 27, 1999)
The child, a boy, was 3 1/2 at the date of the first alleged wrongful removal. He had lived in the United States all of
Legal Case
TGI Guingamp, 2 septembre 1999, No de RG 99/00777
L’enfant, un gar?on, ?tait ?g? de 13 ans ? la date du non-retour dont le caract?re illicite ?tait all?gu?. Les parents avaient divorc?; l’enfant r?sidait