
Re W. (Minors) (Abduction: Father’s Rights) [1999] Fam 1
The children were 4 _ and almost 3 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They had until then spent all of their lives
The children were 4 _ and almost 3 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They had until then spent all of their lives
Grave Risk – Art. 13(1)(b) The court accepted the arguments presented by the mother that the father’s alcoholism and drug addiction constituted a grave risk
Grave Risk – Art. 13(1)(b) On 6 February 1998 an expert on child psychiatry found that the girls had had a very turbulent life, and
The child, a girl, was approximately 9 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in Sweden all of her life. The
Droit de garde – art. 3 Ayant constat? que l’enfant avait sa r?sidence habituelle au Qu?bec au moment du d?placement, la cour d’appel consulta les
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 The court held that while the father possessed joint rights of custody he could not establish that he was
The application concerned a girl born in Taiwan to an American father and Taiwanese mother. She was 3 at the date of the alleged wrongful
The children, both girls, were 6 and 4 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. They had lived in both Germany and the United
L’affaire concernait un enfant de parents espagnols, n? ? Paris en janvier 1989. D?s l’automne pr?c?dent, les parents s’?taient s?par?s, le mari entretenant une relation
Consent – Art. 13(1)(a) The appeal court did not find that the father had agreed to the children staying permanently in Denmark. Rather the agreement