
V.L.K. 11. Marts 1998, afd. K, B-2717-97
Grave Risk – Art. 13(1)(b) On 6 February 1998 an expert on child psychiatry found that the girls had had a very turbulent life, and
Grave Risk – Art. 13(1)(b) On 6 February 1998 an expert on child psychiatry found that the girls had had a very turbulent life, and
The child, a girl, was approximately 9 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. She had lived in Sweden all of her life. The
Droit de garde – art. 3 Ayant constat? que l’enfant avait sa r?sidence habituelle au Qu?bec au moment du d?placement, la cour d’appel consulta les
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 The court held that while the father possessed joint rights of custody he could not establish that he was
The application concerned a girl born in Taiwan to an American father and Taiwanese mother. She was 3 at the date of the alleged wrongful
The children, both girls, were 6 and 4 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. They had lived in both Germany and the United
L’affaire concernait un enfant de parents espagnols, n? ? Paris en janvier 1989. D?s l’automne pr?c?dent, les parents s’?taient s?par?s, le mari entretenant une relation
Consent – Art. 13(1)(a) The appeal court did not find that the father had agreed to the children staying permanently in Denmark. Rather the agreement
The child, a boy, was 1 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. The infant had lived in both England and Ireland. The parents
The children, a boy and a girl, were aged 13 and 11 1/2 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. They had lived