
7Ob35/97s, Oberster Gerichtshof
L’enfant, un gar?on, ?tait n? au Canada, d’une m?re autrichienne et d’un p?re mexicain. Le p?re demanda le divorce en Juin 1995 devant une juridiction
L’enfant, un gar?on, ?tait n? au Canada, d’une m?re autrichienne et d’un p?re mexicain. Le p?re demanda le divorce en Juin 1995 devant une juridiction
L’enfant, une fille, ?tait ?g?e d’un an ? la date du d?placement dont le caract?re illicite ?tait all?gu?. La famille vivait dans le Michigan. Le
The child, a girl, was 7 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. On 25 August 1988 the parents signed an agreement before a
The child, a girl, was aged almost 1 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. The parents were married. On 25 October 1996 the
The children were 13, 11 and 7 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They had lived in Spain all of their lives. In
The children, a boy and a girl, were 10 1/4 and 8 3/4 at the date of the alleged wrongful removal. They had lived in
The alleged wrongful retention related to four children. On 22 July 1996 the mother took them from their home in England to visit their father
The children, a boy and a girl, were aged 13 and 11 1/2 respectively at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. They had moved
The mother and father married in England in 1985 and divorced in 1988. Their one child, a girl, was born in 1988. Under the terms
The children, both girls, were 4 _ and 3 at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. They had lived in both Finland and the