CA Paris, 6 novembre 2012, No de RG 11/18814
L’affaire concernait une enfant n?e en avril 2002 dont la m?re vivait en Allemagne et le p?re en France. L’enfant vivait habituellement en Allemagne. ?? une date ind?termin?e, l’enfant vint vivre en France avec son p?re. En 2011, la m?re demanda le retour de l’enfant en Allemagne. Le juge de premi?re instance, qui auditionna l’enfant, […]
B. c. Belgique (Requ?te No 4320/11)
The case concerned a child born in the United States of America in 2003. During her early pregnancy, the mother had been beaten by the father, who wanted her to have an abortion. The parents argued over the child’s custody for years. The child lived with her mother until 2007. In 2008, an alternating-custody agreement […]
Šneersone and Kampanella v. Italy (Application No 14737/09)
The case concerned a child born in Italy in 2002 to a Latvian mother and an Italian father. The parents never married and separated in 2003. The mother contended that the father had played a minimal role in raising the child. On 20 September 2004 the Rome Youth Court granted sole custody of the child […]
Solicitud conforme al Convenio de La Haya sobre los Aspectos Civiles de la Sustracci?n Internacional de Menores – Casaci?n, IUE 9999-68/2010
The child was born in 2006 in the United States of America. The parents married after the birth, and the father recognized the child. The child lived in the United States of America until taken to Uruguay. The parents were not living together when the mother sought to take the child on vacation, the father […]
G., P. C. c. H., S. M. s/ reintegro de hijos
The proceedings concerned three children. The father (Argentinean) and the mother (of American citizenship and Argentinean nationality) married in November 1999 in Argentina. The first son was born in June 2000 and the second in January 2002, both in Argentina. In January 2003, the family moved to the United States of America. In February 2004, […]
Tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg, 15 juin 2012, R?f?r? No 423/2012
Droit de garde – art. 3 Le p?re soutenait que le d?placement de l’enfant commun par la m?re sans qu’il en soit inform? ?tait illicite au sens de la Convention de 1980. La m?re all?guait ?tre investie de l’autorit? parentale exclusive sur l’enfant, les conditions d’application de l’article 3 de la Convention de 1980 n’?taient […]
Oberlandesgericht Hamm, II-11 UF 85/12, 28 June 2012
Rights of Custody – Art. 3 The daughter was born in Germany when her parents were still married, as a result of which the parents had joint custody. The son was born in Poland after the parents had divorced, and the father was entered as such on his birth certificate, meaning that it is also […]
Tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg, 10 juillet 2012, R?f?r? No 496/2012
Risque grave – art. 13(1)(b) La m?re all?guait ne pas avoir eu connaissance de la d?cision du Tribunal de la famille du 7 d?cembre 2010 fixant la r?sidence de l’enfant avec son p?re. Elle invoquait l’existence d’un risque grave au sens de l’article 13(1)(b) du fait que l’enfant ?tait, lors de son d?part, sous la […]
RCL v. APBL [2012] NZHC 1292
The proceedings concerned children, both boys, born in the United Kingdom on 31 May 2006 and 4 November 2007. The parents, both originally from New Zealand, had relocated to the United Kingdom in mid 2001, and had married in August 2002. The parents divorced on 23 March 2010. In May 2010, following mediation, the parents […]
Khan v. Fatima, 680 F.3d 781 (7th Cir. 2012)
The proceedings concerned a child who was three years old at the time of the appellate hearing. The parents, both of Indian ethnicity, had entered into an arranged marriage two years before the birth of the child. The family lived in Canada. The mother was a United States citizen. During a family visit to India […]