
CA Dijon, 15 juillet 2008, No de RG 08/00923
Acquiescement – art. 13(1)(a) La cour estima que la m?re n’avait pas ?tabli que le p?re avait acquiesc? au non-retour. Il avait donn? son autorisation

Acquiescement – art. 13(1)(a) La cour estima que la m?re n’avait pas ?tabli que le p?re avait acquiesc? au non-retour. Il avait donn? son autorisation

The application related to twins born in Venezuela in 1999 to married Venezuelan parents. In 2005 the mother petitioned for divorce after meeting an American

Aims of the Convention – Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 The Inner House noted that submissions which in essence sought to argue that a return

The application related to four boys who were aged 10, 7, 5 and 3 years at the time of the appellate hearing. Until May 2006

The application related to two children, born in April 1997 and April 1999 respectively. They had lived in Sweden with their parents until early 2004

The proceedings related to two children born in October 1996 and June 1998. Two older siblings, not subject of the proceedings, were born in October

The case concerned a child born in the United States in 2001. The family was habitually resident in Italy. In 2005 the mother wrongfully removed

European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) Article 8 Right to Family Life The father alleged that his right to family life under Article 8 of

L’affaire concernait quatre enfants n?s en 1992, 1996, 1999 et 2001 de parents allemands. Les parents ?taient mari?s. Le 19 mai 2007, la m?re quitta

The application concerned a child born in New York on 18 May 2007. The parents had been in an on off relationship since October 2004